To be fair, the falling off may be the lens - I can't tell. Basically it seems like there just aren't enough threads engaging. I am using it on a refurbished (by Nikon) Nikon AF-S 55-300 1:4.5-5.6. I have NOT tried any other filter on the lens.I have the same filter in 52mm and have used it on 2 other lenses (18-55 and 55-200) and it seems to engage more than this bigger filter in the longer lens.As long as you get it seated and remember to twist the filter orientation in the direction of tightening the filter it's okay. I got it backwards and ended up unscrewing the filter (which only seems to be less than a full revolution - less that one full thread) and it fell into dry sand. It doesn't look like it got damaged but I just don't enjoy using it because of the high possibility it may fall off again.And, it's hard to get the threads started.Again, I haven't used any other filter on this lens so it could be the lens too, which is more of a question because the lens was refurbished (although the threads don't look bad or as though they'd been truncated somehow).As for the pictures, I used it to effectively remove glare from a water body. It seems to work fine (as does my 52mm which I've used a lot more). No complaints but I may not see differences between this and a B+W anyway. I can certainly see the difference between this and no filter. I'd buy one again. I think the Tiffen's are a great cross between results and price. When I start seeing artifacts maybe I'll spring for a B+W or other brand.

I bought this for my Canon EFS 17-55 mm f/2.8 IS USM. I am still using it on the same lens and is doing a very good job without distorting or altering the images. Great stuff

I love macro photography and recently brought a regular speedlight (albeit a compact one) so that I could take it around with me; a bit of a pain, if I'm honest, with having the diffuser on it and trying to get the best light. Then I noticed this one a month after, and it was even cheaper, so I thought I would try it.I actually have 2 macro lenses over the years, a Nikon F mount and a Nikon Z mount, and there is an important thing you need to do with the Z mount lens; do not mount the flash to the lens part, which moves in and out, attach it with a larger adapter to the outer case. This is because it will put undue pressure on the lens and can result in lens motor failure. I did a lot of research on that, so I thought you should know.Loved the fact that it came with so many adapters, as I was a bit worried I was going to have to find some to fit my lenses.The light is beautifully even that comes out of it and really makes your picture pop, and the cable to the main unit is soft and flexible and doesn't pull against front. Very simple controls on the back to adjust the power, and so far, I've only needed the lowest setting for macro work, although I'm sure the higher setting will come in useful for portraits (not tried that yet).

Mount seems a little tight. The 18-55 fits much better. Not sure if the lens is re-furb, used, or new. Unsure what "white box" means. Came with no Canon literature or packaging. Lens works well and takes a clear bright pic.I guess the low price is why it came the way it did. All that's left is to go on a picture taking trip and test it against my Olympus E-PL1.

I enjoy macro photography and was very happy when Nikon announced the 105mm f2.8 Micro lens for the Z mount cameras.The lens is larger than than the F mount counterpart, but not as heavy. It produces outstanding images, sharp from corner to corner. As a S-line Z mount lens, it has a customizable control ring and function button.Focusing is quick and silent, and the lens includes a focus-limiting switch to limit the working distance for close up work. It also has 4.5 stops of VR, so while you may not want to necessarily ditch the tripod for true macro work, you can use this in the field with confidence if you are not traveling with a tripod. The included photo was taken handheld.Highly recommended!

I bought this filter for my Tamron 17-28mm e-mount lens and love it. I haven't noticed any major color distortion and the sharpness doesn't seem to be affected at all either. The low profile seems to negate most vignetting you may encounter, but it does show up (unsurprisingly) if you stack this with another filter like a CPL. The gold ring is a nice touch too. I would absolutely buy these again as you get great results for the money.

I really like this bag. Bought it at a third of the price of a Lowepro sling bag and have been trucking it all over Greece this summer! I can fit my crop sensor DSLR (Nikon D5100) + my two main lenses (Sigma 55-200 f/2.8 and Nikon 55-200 f/4-5.6) + Sirui T-005 tripod + iPad in main compartment. Room for cash, sunglasses case, sunscreen, remote, extra battery, and various other accessories in top compartment (I also occasionally carry my 50mm prime in there). You can rearrange the dividers in the main compartment any way you want (which I have done several times). Make no mistake - this is a no frills bag. But it seems durable, is comfortable to wear, and for me has been highly functional.

I debated for quite a while between this lens and the 17-55 f/2.8 EF-S IS. I'm still drooling over that lens, but what it came down to in the end was my plan to upgrade to the 5D when, and if the Mark II is released. Of course, the other lens that could have made the decision even more difficult is the 16-35 f/2.8L, but it was way out of my price range.I'm happy with my choice. The lens is well built and sharp. If I have any complaints it would be CA. This lens does tend to show a bit of color fringing, but nothing and extra five seconds in raw processing can't fix. So I guess that point is moot.Overall, this is a good lens. Well worth the money. Especially at this price.