Best Camera With Canon Lenses Mount
Related Reviews
D. Baker
5
Best Bang for Buck
Best bang for buck in the Canon range of lenses.Just buy it. No brainer.
14/01/2023
Timothy
5
Adapts to my canon lenses perfectly
It's nice to be able to use my other canon lenses on my Canon m200
29/09/2022
Harry B
5
Photography Addiction!!!!
Since I was a child I always had a camera and loved taking pictures. My first camera was a Kodak 35mm rectangle job. You know the one with the square one time use flash on top? I then had Vivitars and Ritchshot In May of 2000 I bought the Canon Rebel EOS for trips to China and Australia. I never fully got proper use of the camera because film does not show the errors of your settings. I then went on to buy several Nikon Cool Pix and a Canon Powershot S2. In December of 2009 my wife and I bought each other as a gift to ourselves this camera. Words do not describe the feeling of "arriving" as an artisitc photographer. Ous lives will never be the same.I must say I am biast against Nikon SLR's because my friends have them, and with the graduation to lenses and accessories I will be Canon 4 life.The functions of this camera are amazing. Eveything I struggled with for years in film, and inept point and shoot and powershot cameras came to an abrupt end by purchasing this one. The functions people struggle with, tones, lighting, sharpness are answered in a matter of a few test shots going through normal photography education (a quick reference guide in the owners manaual gives a brief overview that you can learn what you need to know). The book was a guide that in the 1st week and several hundred shots later were answered by photographs that made friends and family think they were fake or not done by this camera. I will be posting photos here on 3/19/10 of what I am trying to convey. The use of the picture style defines the photos that you take. Monochrome, Sepia, landscape with the right filters brings out the inner photographer you never knew you had. You will never, ever go back to the automatic settings after two weeks of using P, TV, AV, M, and A-Dep setting. The 12.1 Megapixles is great for framing the highest quality photos in 11x14 frames. I do not belive in the near future our walls we be able to hold our photos, we will have to keep switching them out.The only warning I have for buyers of this camera, or any SLR is that these are the cameras that take you to a new comfortable level and that comes with a price!!! you start off with the 18-55mm lense. That is not good enough. You must then get filters to bring out the landscapes and protraits you are taking. Then you move on to buying the 70-200mm or 70-300mm lenses, because you need the advance lenses to take action photos, or landscape photos. Then you need a wide angle lense, because taking pictures in the mountains or indoors, or of landscapes you get tired of backing up and not getting what you want in the shot. Then comes the hood for the wide angle, and the UV filter, and it goes on and on. Think of the camera as a foundation to advanced photography, however the lenses, the flash, and the filters, which will run you $700-$2000 it is what defines the pictures themselves. This camera is an awesome tool to capture your view of the world, the events in your life, and convey them in a professional manner. The price is fair and it will be a camera for years and years of professional photography.
23/08/2022
Sanpete
5
What makes this special?
I'll mostly focus on what makes this camera different. Besides those looking for a fine all-around camera with excellent image quality--Digital Photography Review's Midrange Camera of the Year--there are three groups who might be especially interested in the M6ii:1. Those who want to shoot some kinds of action, sports, birds in flight and such with a smaller and/or less expensive setup than with a DSLR.2. Those who want compact high resolution, and at a reasonable price.3. Those who already have EF-M or EF/EF-S-mount lenses they want to use on a leading-edge APS-C mirrorless body, or whose lens plans can be fulfilled with less expense via the EF-M mount, whose current lenses are all under $500.This is an enthusiast- to pro-level camera, and some of the terminology reflects that, but I hope most of it's intelligible to new enthusiasts.According to Canon, the M6ii is the replacement for both the M6 and M5, so I'll address the removable EVF.1. Action, pre-buffering, AF/AE, EVF speedIt's still early days, but the M6ii looks very promising for action. Several things contribute to good action shooting, one of which the M6ii leads its class in, and others it's very good at.It's the APS-C mirrorless with by far the most frames per second, has a pre-buffer mode, Servo (what most call continuous) autofocus mostly fast enough, and very little screen/EVF lag. I don't have the best lenses to test some of this, so part of what I'll say is based on reports in reviews and at forums.It has a 14fps mode for full-size RAW, JPEG, or both in bursts up to 25-48 shots. This mode uses the mechanical shutter, so no rolling shutter artifacts. There are also 7fps and 3fps modes.There's a 30fps mode for cropped 18MP C-RAW in up to 84-shot bursts (highest I've seen is 71). The crop leaves 75% x 75%. This mode uses electronic shutter, so there can be rolling shutter artifacts, though it seems to scan fast enough to usually avoid those. And it's quiet.Pre-buffering is available for the 30fps mode. When selected, pressing the shutter button halfway starts recording at 30fps, temporarily storing the most recent 15. When you fully press the button to start shooting, the previous 15 frames are saved along with the new shots. Gives an extra half-second of reaction time.For action when you know where it will be, such as birds taking off or cars at a finish line, you can set up with AF lock and let fly with prebuffering to be sure to get the perfect frame.Servo (continuous) autofocus is fast, can be good even at 30fps. Naturally, as subject speed increases or size decreases, the number of keepers may go down. Tracking is good once locked in. For cars rushing along (large target), it's remarkably good. Good results have been reported for motorsports, hockey, basketball, footraces, and birds in flight. Some who own both still consider the 7Dii better for action overall, but in some ways the M6ii can match or beat it, and some prefer it for action.There's no setting to require focus acquisition before the next shot in burst modes.AF is good in low light, down to -5EV (full moonlight) at f/1.4 for stills, -2.5EV for 4K video. The on-sensor AF is reportedly actually better than most DSLRs when lenses are stopped down much.Auto exposure can also be set to adjust during burst modes, should your bird fly into shadows.The screen/EVF has live view between shots for the 7fps and 3fps modes. In 14fps and 30fps modes it shows the shot just taken between shots, a new image every .07 or .03 seconds, so it looks live and you can tell if you're tracking right.There's some extra post-processing required for the 30fps mode. The shots in one burst are stored in one file that only Canon's free Digital Photo Pro app recognizes. You have to extract shots you want one at a time, after which you can process normally. I expect that will change as other software catches up.The M6ii isn't weather sealed, so it's not ideal for use where it might get very wet or dirty.(There's no uncropped electronic-shutter burst mode, but you can trick the camera into shooting 7-9 fps that way by selecting focus bracketing, which uses the electronic shutter, and flipping the focus switch on the back or lens to manual before shooting. You can set up with AF, but it's only manual focus once you flip that switch. The sensor scan rate is slower than for the 30fps cropped mode, so rolling shutter may be more of a problem. Credit to R2D2 at DPReview forums.)2. Resolution, noise, diffraction32.5MP resolution is the highest among APS-C mirrorless cameras, about 25% more pixels than the next highest (26.1), about 12% more along one side. There are a few EF-M-mount lenses with resolution to match, making a compact, moderately-priced high-resolution package.A potential downside of more pixels is more noise. In challenging circumstances the M6ii can be a little noisier than some lower-resolution alternatives, at least if you're using that extra resolution, but it cleans up nicely, still quite usable for many purposes up to 6400-12800. In-camera JPEG noise reduction is impressive.An effect of higher resolution is that diffraction starts reducing sharpness sooner as you stop down the aperture. The effect is barely noticeable compared to the M5 and M6, about 1/4-stop sooner. Compared to some others it's more like a full stop. Worth keeping in mind to get the most resolution out of the sensor.3. Lenses (including the kit lens), EF/EF-S adapterThe M6ii is the most advanced mirrorless APS-C body that will accept the most Canon EF-M or EF/EF-S lenses with the fewest compromises. I put it that way because EF/EF-S lenses can be used on non-Canon bodies with adapters, but with varying degrees of success: some function normally, some not nearly as well as on the M6ii.The lenses that best preserve the size advantages of this camera are EF-M. There are seven from Canon, plus three with EF-M mounts from Sigma, covering 11-200mm (18-320mm equivalent), with excellent fast (f/1.4) primes at wide, standard, and portrait focal lengths. There are also numerous EF-M-mount lenses, mostly manual, from budget manufacturers. And more are on the way. And all EF-M lenses are under $500.There are EF/EF-S-mount lenses that serve every imaginable purpose. For those you need an adapter. No glass or chip is involved, and full functionality is preserved. (I use the Meike adapter, cheap and very light because it's plastic except for the business ends, sold under several names here. Works fine.)My main camera has been a Sony A7, but most of the lenses I've bought to use with it have EF/EF-S mounts, because of cost. So for now I'm using the famous EF 50mm (80mm equivalent) f/1.8, the EF-S 55-250 (88-400mm equivalent) IS, and some third-party ones, a motley but effective budget crew for most purposes.With the viewfinder (essential for me), the M6ii body is similar in size and weight to my A7, but the difference in the size and weight of the equivalent kit zoom lenses makes me laugh. It's like the difference between having a lime and a large orange in front.That lime, the 15-45mm (24-72mm), is a good, inconspicuous walk-around lens. 24mm is wider than most kit lenses, which I like. It's not fast, f/3.5-6.3, but the image stabilization, over 3 stops worth, allows it to be used at slow shutter speeds. (The slowness allows it to be compact.) Sharpness and color are fairly good. Bokeh can be a little edgy.That kit lens and EVF cost $500 total separately, and this kit is only $250 more than the body, so it's a good deal.The other six current Canon EF-M lenses, all with STM AF, all compact and inexpensive for what they do:11-22mm (18-35mm equivalent) f/4-5.6 with IS18-150mm (29-240mm) f/3.5-6.3 IS (also a kit lens)22mm (35mm) f/228mm (45mm) f/3.5 Macro (1.2x) IS32mm (51mm) f/1.455-200 (88-320mm) f/4.5-6.3 IS.The three EF-M-mount lenses from Sigma, all f/1.4 with AF: 16mm (26mm), 30mm (48mm), 56mm (90mm).Viltrox is reportedly about to release three more, all f/1.4 with AF: 23mm (37mm), 33mm (53mm), 56mm (90mm).There are also some useful cheaper lenses sold with EF-M mounts from brands like Samyang/Rokinon, Meike/Neewer, Tamron, etc. Mostly completely manual, but not always.Among the primes, the performance stars for sharpness that matches the high resolution of this camera even wide open are the Canon 32 and Sigma 56. The Canon 22 also deserves notice for its combination of speed, pancake compactness, and fine image quality.For the zooms, the 11-22 is a favorite for good sharpness and overall performance.The M6ii's competitors have an advantage in being able to use their brand's full-frame mirrorless lenses without an adapter, which the Canon M cameras can't do even with a adapter. (The smaller M mount does allow the lenses to be a bit smaller than they would be if they shared the R mount.)Removable EVF, touch-and-drag AFNot having a built-in viewfinder makes the body smaller, lighter and less expensive, and you can still add the EVF when you want it. It's quite sturdy, normal use isn't likely to hurt it.The removable EVF makes it easier to use the touchscreen to set focus points/frames while you're looking through the EVF, a feature Canon calls touch-and-drag AF. With a built-in EVF your face gets in the way of your finger and may move the focus point accidentally. This removable EVF sticks back away from the screen enough to make touch and drag more practical.If you get the EVF with one of the kits, it's essentially free.But you do have to take it off to use the hot shoe for a flash, which I don't like.Video, vloggingVideo is uncropped up to 4K at 30fps (or 25, 24 is due via firmware update in 2020), FHD up to 120fps. You can shoot half-hour clips.It looks good. AF, including tracking, is accurate and smooth, even in low light. City night street scenes are easy. Color is good across changing light sources. Reviewers say the 4K isn't quite as sharp as what you can get from some competing cameras, though I haven't noticed when casually watching vids from both.There's digital image stabilization that I haven't tried yet, but it should be especially handy with lenses lacking IS. It applies about a 10% crop so the image gets a bit larger (still 4K). People say it's effective.For vlogging, you can tilt up the screen so you can see it from the front. There's a 1/8" (3.5mm) microphone jack, but no provision for headphones.Fv modeThis has the usual exposure modes, plus Fv mode (Flexible-value or Flexible-priority). By default, it's just like P (Program or Auto) mode. What's different is that you can use two of the top dials to quickly control shutter speed, aperture, ISO and/or exposure compensation via a menu at the bottom of the live screen/EVF, so you don't need to look away from what you're shooting. You can control things fully manually that way; whatever you don't change remains in auto mode. Settings stay as you last had them when you turned the camera off. Pressing a certain button on the back returns you to full auto.Battery life, third-party batteriesThe battery life spec, 305 shots, isn't even close, common for this kind of camera. I haven't made a good battery test yet, but I've read two reports of over 3,000 shots with power still left using drive modes, and one of over 1,200 using bursts of 2-3 shots and EVF. One person says he often shoots 400-800 shots without the battery indicator moving from full.Unlike the M6 and M5, the M6ii treats third-party batteries the same as Canon brand, including showing the battery level. (Canon recommends using only Canon brand. I've always used third-party batteries in my cameras, after reading reviews, and have never had any trouble.)FlashRated for 15 feet and 15mm focal length (24mm equivalent), able to be angled upward for bounce flash, 3.4-second recycle time.Silver vs blackThe color options are mostly about looks, but if you'll be shooting in hot sun a lot, the silver color might absorb less heat. Cameras can overheat in heavy use.Some find the silver color looks retro. Some find it less professional, which can be an advantage or disadvantage. Many find black less conspicuous, or stealthier.FutureThere's concern about how long Canon will continue the M series. The number of Canon EF-M lenses remains small, and recently Canon introduced its full-frame mirrorless R system, which has its own mount incompatible with the M system. Canon could introduce an APS-C R series and make M obsolete. It would have the advantage of allowing their APS-C and full-frame mirrorless models to share lenses. It would have the disadvantage of making the APS-C lenses and/or cameras a bit bigger to fit the larger mount.As an owner of the Nikon V1, part of the discontinued 1 series, I think this is a legitimate concern. The best argument against it may be the M6ii itself, which represents a clear commitment to significantly upgrading the M series. And there are rumors of another M camera next year.Other pointsThe grip and button positions are great for my smallish male hand; some with larger hands find it crowded. Some complain about using large lenses with a small body, but I always put a hand under large lenses anyway. Has a nice textured, grippy surface.This is customizable in a zillion ways, including what you see on the screen/viewfinder and what you can assign the buttons and dials to do. You can have two sets of custom settings.The downloadable manual is 600 pages, and that's all in English. I don't think it will be a bestseller. Despite the level of detail, I often find it hard to follow, with an over-reliance on symbols. Some parts are hard to find, some points not explained, and it was easier to look some stuff up with Google. But it's still very useful for stepping through most of the incredible array of things that are packed into this little device.
24/07/2022
stacey lalande
5
Perfect substitute
Perfect adapter for the f series camera and older canon lenses.
07/07/2022
Michaux
4
The Best Traveling Canon
To put this review in context, I must first describe my purpose and expectations for the camera. Although the M50 is offered as an "entry level" camera, I am hardly a neophyte, having been an avid photography hobbyist since purchasing my first 35mm camera in 1963. My current system consists of an older Canon APSC DSLR (t2i) with multiple lenses, flash etc. I was searching for a more compact "travel" camera to augment that system, not replace it. For that purpose, the Eos M cameras seemed the logical choice since they can be adapted to EF/EFS lenses and accept Canon accessories, but only two of them, the M5 and M50, have viewfinders, which I consider essential (the M6 accepts an optional viewfinder that increases it's cost to that of the M5 and disables the hot shoe; no joy.) According to other reviewers, the M50 has a less robust "feel" and inferior operator interface to the M5, but also has the latest generation processor, enhanced Dual Pixel AF and fully articulated touch screen. The M50's 4K video has been widely criticized, but video is not my priority. Before purchasing the M50, my greatest reservations were the "dumbed-down" user interface (compared to the M5) and the relatively short battery life. When the M50 kit with 15-45mm lens was offered with lens adapter at a 32% discount, I couldn't resist.Out of the box, I like this camera. It is a nice size, shaped to provide a good grip and with a "rubberized" texture on the right hand grip surfaces. The 15-45mm lens is quite compact, making for an easily packable travel camera, as I had hoped. This is a really small lens for a 3:1 zoom on an APS-C camera and the retractable feature helps make it so. The small M50 with 15-45mm lens is a very useful and less obtrusive "walk-around" combination. Some have cited the retraction as an inconvenience and, if so, you can always leave it extended and it is still small for its function. At its longest (45mm), the M lens is physically shorter than the EFS 18-55 at its shortest position (32mm). I like the retractable capability. The 15-45mm also has internal focusing and a non-rotating front element allowing use of a polarizing filter. The lens has a plastic mount but I have been using three other canon lenses with plastic mounts for about 7 years without problems or visible wear so I'm not concerned. The small size is possible, in part, because of a relatively "slow" aperture (f3.5-6.3) that at the long end puts it in diffraction limited territory for a 24MP APS sensor, but that is physics' "fault", not Canon's and applies to all 24mp APS cameras at about f6 or higher. Arguably, 18-20mp is a more appropriate upper limit for APS-C and note that both Canon and Nikon have limited their top-of-the-line APS cameras to about 20-21mp. That said, I've been impressed by the detail available in the M50 images, even at 100% crop. The dual pixel AF is fast and accurate and the large coverage area is a benefit, particularly with the touch focus ability. I have, however, encountered a situation where the spot focus mode missed its mark, presumably due to the size of the spot. With the focus spot centered on the white neck of an egret that was thinner than the spot, the M50 focused on the grass behind, rather than the egret, and this occurred repeatedly usually preferring the higher contrast detail even though farther away. The viewfinder is bright and clear and there is minimal lag or smearing as the camera is panned, unlike my first digital camera (Fuji S602Z). The viewfinder "exposure simulation" brightness is helpful as are the histogram and level. I still prefer an optical finder, but it is nice to have a full array of settings as well as image post-view in the EVF. The fully articulated touch screen is very useful and can be reversed to protect it in the stored position, unlike the M5. No, the handling "feel" of the M50 is not the equal of a DSLR, but is an acceptable trade-off for portability, particularly for situations where photography may not be the primary purpose of the excursion.Regarding the simplified user interface, it is somewhat inconvenient, but not a show-stopper. Most functions are easily accessible, once you learn where to find them and/or have reconfigured the controls to your priorities, but there are exceptions. Auto exposure bracketing is only accessible via menu and cannot be assigned to a control, nor does exposure bias, which has a dedicated button by default, provide a path to AEB. The ability to reassign functions to buttons is a distinct advantage as are configurable user menus but there are simply not enough controls to assign all frequently used functions, so regular menu use is unavoidable, but certainly AEB should be assignable. There is a "Quick Control Screen" accessible by pressing the "Set" button but I don't find it as useful as the "Quickmenu" of my old Canon nor does it provide access to AEB. Fortunately, there is also a "INFO Quick control screen" that will appear on the view screen (not the EVF) as you cycle through display options with the "INFO" button. This is similar to the "Quickmenu" of my DSLR and does provide access to AEB. Alternatively, you can create a custom menu that includes AEB. For most functions, there are multiple solutions; it is a matter of figuring out what combinations best work for you while avoiding conflicts that the manual does not disclose.The greatest handicap to user familiarity is the user manual, which is poorly organized and inadequately indexed with many trivially redundant entries wasting valuable space (it appears formatted for pages that are half the height of the manual as printed). An example is the on-screen level display which is not found in the index or table of contents and if you manage to find it by brute force search through the camera menus, as I did, there is no mention of the fact that the level display is mutually exclusive to tracking AF, a seemingly unrelated function!? Since tracking was already enabled, there was no level display and I only learned of the conflict through an extensive internet search where I found it mentioned in a comment to a review; and this after using the camera for a week. Older Canon manuals were much more descriptive and complete. The pull-up flash is a bit of an anachronism for a camera that emphasizes fully automatic operation, however, that is of no concern since it is as easy to flip up the flash as it is to push a button. What is curious is that raising the flash does not turn it on unless it has been enabled via menu or button (one is dedicated by default). This is not a problem once you know to enable the flash, however, I do not know whether leaving it enabled (either "AUTO" or "ON") affects battery life when the flash is down, therefore, I disable flash when not in use, and it seems a poor use of precious control real estate to need to have it assigned to a button as is the default, unless it is necessary to conserve battery (see below). The flash must also be enabled to use external flash.Silent mode is a potentially useful feature of the M50 that has been rendered virtually useless by its implementation as a "scene" selection, which limits it to fully automatic operation that I am not likely to use. Silent operation would be useful for wildlife photography or for tripod use to eliminate any mechanical vibration (shutter), but why must you forfeit control in order to use it?. Worse, AEB is not available even as a menu option in scene mode and I often need bracketed sequences to process for HDR (in- camera HDR is a scene mode also and is incompatible with raw capture). Speaking of tripod use, another feature that I miss is a remote control jack. Yes, I know that the M50 has WiFi and Bluetooth to allow it to be operated remotely by smartphone and this is a valuable feature allowing remote live-view; but establishing a WiFi connection is a bit fiddly and time consuming and the connection is lost when either device powers down. Once connected, WiFi works well and remote live view with touch focus is a treat. The bluetooth trigger function is easier to connect but provides only a shutter release without focus confirmation, and most curious, it will not function unless WiFi is enabled, even though there are separate menu entries for each. It would often be more convenient to use my existing wireless triggers and I sometimes photograph when traveling where there is no cell service and would have no other reason to carry my phone and keep it charged. This is not hypothetical, as my first use of the M50 was during a trip to West Virginia in areas without cell service and I was also carrying my DSLR (which does not have WiFi) and I needed my triggers anyway.The M50's limited battery capacity has been noted in other reviews and I can confirm that it discharges much faster than my DSLR. It was not a problem when I was away from a charger for only a few hours at a time, but on a trip to Tangier Island, the fully charged battery expired after only 129 shots in 8 hours of intermittent use in ECO mode! Fortunately, no opportunities were missed because I was about to head back to the B&B anyway. I can only speculate that the use of an EFS 55-250mm lens for 89 of the shots is the culprit, which presumably imposes a larger load for its focus motor than does the 15-45mm. Also note that the default focus setting is "continuous", which constantly refocuses even without pressing the shutter button. I didn't know this until I first mounted an EFS lens and saw the front element turning erratically. I will definitely buy more batteries, a total of 3 may suffice, but whereas I also carry 3 batteries for my DSLR, I seldom bring a charger on trips of a few days. With the M50 I will always travel with a charger. The physically smaller battery of the M50 helps facilitate the camera's diminutive size and is an understandable trade-off, but it can be inconvenient.The EFM-EF/EFS lens adapter is sturdy with metal body and lens/camera mounts and nicely finished. The small tripod foot is removable with a captive, knurled knob and the foot is keyed to the adapter so that it fits squarely and securely. I was, however, surprised by the adapter's heft until I realized that much of the mass is the foot, which seems cast of a dense metal, not a light alloy as is (I presume) the adapter body; to hazard a guess, I'd say brass, which is more than 3 times the mass of aluminum. Both the adapter body and the foot have steel 1/4x20 threaded inserts. The entire assembly weighs approx. 5.5oz, of which 2.0oz is the foot alone. The good news is that it works well with all EF/EFS lenses that I have tried, including my Tamron 150-600mm G2 (yes, the M50 does look silly mounted to such a huge lens and you must be cautious to support the lens independent of the camera.). It's worth noting that the adapter is not merely a mechanical adaptation, it involves electronic translation as well since the EFS system has only 8 contacts while EFM uses 9. In addition, EFS lenses have auto/manual and IS on/off switches while EFM have none and are switched in-camera. I'll also note that the M50 manual instructs to turn off the camera before mounting or dismounting a lens while my older Canon does not.My final gripe does not regard the camera, per se, rather Canon's software support of it, specifically the ability to easily transfer files to computer. Previously, Canon provided their "Zoom browser memory card utility" that would automatically organize files into dated folders at the location of your choice on PC. Unfortunately that utility has not been updated to recognize .CR3 files and the new "Image Transfer Utility" only operates via WiFi connection. While this may have some use, it is far less convenient than simply plugging an SD card into a computer, particularly when one must use different methods and software for different cameras of the same make. This is all the more frustrating since most other software options (including Windows) do not yet recognize .CR3 files. This is a particularly bad choice on Canon's part considering the limited battery capacity of the M50 without facility to power from an external source.Regarding software, Canon has revised their Digital Photo Professional (DPP) software for the .CR3 format and the M50 has provision to turn on lens corrections in-camera so that when opened in DPP, they are already applied, saving some processing time. This includes the application of DLO (digital lens optimizer) at what is, I assume, a predetermined optimum value for the lens settings used, but this can be adjusted in post. The 24mp files of the M50 do take significantly longer to process than the 18mp files of my DSLR and, while editing, changes may take some time before they display (I'm using an i7 processor and16GB ram). Regarding noise reduction, the default settings seem more aggressive than my DSLR for some ISO settings, but "High ISO noise reduction" can be adjusted to some degree (3 steps) in-camera and, of course, more finely in DPP during post. Incidentally, DPP v4 ability to play nice with Windows 10 has been substantially improved since its initial release, although I still encounter the occasional issue. For those not using DPP as their raw processor or who may have been turned off by DPP v3, version 4 is greatly improved and, in my view, the lens corrections of DLO are indispensable. DLO virtually banishes all lens aberrations and sharpens the image such that you may think that you have new lenses, particularly if you are using some kit lenses such as the 18-55mm IS II (unfortunately, DLO is for Canon lenses only). DLO v4 does not double the raw file size as did v3. I'm puzzled that DLO does not receive more notice in the photographic press. A note to Lightroom users: according to the Adobe site, they do not intend to add .CR3 support to Lightroom 6, so for now, DPP may be the only viable option for the M50 (and future Canon cameras??).In summary, I think that the M50 is an excellent camera for it's target market but needs better documentation to avoid frustrating buyers, particularly those new to photography to which the M50 seems directed. It is a camera that can be used with no fuss as a "point and shoot" yet incorporates a plethora of features that advanced users will value, albeit with some frustration. For my purposes, I believe the M50 is a valuable, if imperfect, addition to my system that will allow me to carry a camera more often and to more places than I might have otherwise, while using my existing lenses and flash if I choose to carry them, all while producing images that are the equal of Canon's latest APS-C DSLRs. The Ideal travel camera might be a next generation M5, melding the positive features of the M50 with the superior control interface of the M5, but of course the M5 costs significantly more. Until then, The M50 may be the best traveling Canon. If only Canon would update their memory card utility and rewrite the manual. And please, Canon, if you're determined to make cameras that are dependent on wireless connection, improve your connection software and provide enough battery to carry the load.EDIT 9/20/18: After processing and critically viewing more images, I feel that the EFM 15-45mm lens needs more comment with regard to resolution toward image extremes, particularly at the 15mm end. Image corners at wide angle can be rather soft, even while the center (actually, most of the image) is strikingly sharp. As one might expect, this is most noticeable in images shot indoors at ISO 1600 (the highest that I have used) with much detail throughout the frame and the softness is exacerbated by the increased noise in the corners due to correction for vignetting (peripheral illumination correction in Canon speak), which is substantial.Regarding Dual Pixel AF, yes it is fast and accurate - except when it isn't. I alluded to some focus misses above and suggested that the spot focus misses were related to the size of the spot, but after more use I realize that the same issue exists among the smaller focus points in the zone and tracking AF modes. I find it often misses more and is less predictable than my old 9 focus point DSLR. It is also slower to acquire focus, at least when first waking up . Part of the issue is inherent in the horizontal split of the dual-pixel array, which cannot focus on features that are much more than 45 degrees from vertical (I have confirmed this by using a lined legal pad as a target). Whereas modern DSLRs have multiple "cross-type" focus points that are sensitive to any orientation (and my old DSLR has but one), the M50 has none. It is far better than contrast AF, but not up to DSLR standards. Note that the Canon DSLRs that have dual pixel AF still use the more complex pentaprism phase detection system when possible. The touch focus ability of the M50 provides a workaround so that you can better direct the focal point, but using the view screen in this way while looking through the viewfinder will require some retraining on my part.I can confirm that battery life is related to the lenses used; in a recent outing where I used the EFS 55-250mm for 99 exposures, the battery was exhausted after only 118 shots in less than 1.5 hours of use. I may need to rethink the adequacy of carrying only 3 batteries.I mentioned that the noise reduction seems more aggressive than with my older Canon, however I neglected to mention that it is also more effective at reducing both chroma and luminance noise while preserving detail.None of this significantly alters my initial assessment of the M50. It is not a DSLR but is smaller and lighter making it better suited to incidental travel photography while providing versatility and image quality far beyond the best that smart phones or small sensor cameras can offer. I may eventually buy other EFM lenses to further reduce my travel bulk. As I've become more familiar with the M50, I find that it is usually my first choice when heading out and that I am carrying a camera more often. The T2i has mostly remained attached to my largest and heaviest lens (Tamron 150-600mm G2) and my 18-55mm EFS lens has not seen the light of day.
23/06/2022
Kell Baker
5
Great bang for your buck
What's to say that hasn't been said? Yes, costs were cut making a budget EOS Camera for the "every man". Thank you Canon for reaching out and up in design and thinking. All the gripes people have about this camera crack me up. It's a great beginner, but suits the seasoned photographer as well. I read where someone called it "plasticky"... people complained that it didn't shoot video in standard def... if you change lenses, it will shoot in standard, for the record.I put a grip on mine, bought some old vintage lenses, threw on some filters and a tulip hood... upgraded the memory card... and after shooting up about 3 cards full of photos as well as 3 full of film since Christmas, I gotta think the world is filled with a bunch of malcontents.Sure... there are gobs and gobs of better more expensive camera's out there, but if this thing came out 10 years ago it would be the most amazing cutting edge tool on the market today. Don't let any bad, picky reviews fool you. This thing is pure Canon soul. I LOVE MINE!!!
06/05/2022
savings monger savings monger
4
Excellent image quality with some caveats
I have to hand it to canon. The M3 is fantastic. I used to be impressed with the T3i and the SL1, but the image quality of the m3 is the best canon camera I have owned. The body is compact, and has an excellent and intuitive layout. The Fold out screen is great for high or low shots including (shudders) Selfies. The best part of the camera, is that with a few inexpensive adapters, I can use nearly any lens ever made. It has revived my relationship with my old manual focus lenses. I have even started perusing thrift shops and have struck gold, finding 2.8 and faster lenses for less than the price of a good burger. Heres what I like and don't like about the camera.Pros:- small size,- good button layout for quick access to most used items - exposure compensation, manual focus zooming,- solid build construction- Wireless image transfer to Iphone ( no wifi network required, but wifi on phone needs to be on)- rapid shutter response times 3 times faster than SL1.- ability to adapt manual focus lenses without extra glass ( FD mount, Nikon mount, pentax mount, screw mount)- Amazing image quality- Focus Peaking when manual focusing is spot on.- Half the size of the SL1- Large screen is easy to see and does reasonably in the sun.Cons- slow focusing with USM and Standard Focus motor lenses (all older technology) I was really disappointed, but not surprised. The hybrid focus system used with the M3 is better geared toward STM system lenses. You will notice a difference compared to just about any of canon's other SLRs and it may be due to the adaptor.- slow start times - 2x as long as the SL1- adapters needed for everything - you need them for every kind of lens you mount to them. the canon eos to M adapter is 200$, the Photodiox one is excellent for 40$- sometimes it's too small. the menu button gets pressed a lot if I am using a large lens.- Heavy. - is half the size of the SL1 and weighs just as much even though it has less going on inside. but is made out of better material.- Screen does well in the sun but can be difficult to see if there is glare.Overall this camera is 4 out of 5 stars. It is everything I wanted from canon except speed.Image included to show the incredible detail and color. It was shot with a 55-250 IS lens with no post processing.
04/01/2022
Related Faq
Q
Will this allow my nikon 1 s1 lenses to mount to my canon t2i?
A
Dear Customer, so sorry to tell you that this adapter won't allow your nikon 1 s1 lenses to mount to my canon t2i. 
Q
I know my camera is not in the list above but will it work with a cannon 80D?
A
Nikon(G)-EOS fit for Nikon G Lens and Canon EOS Mount Camera ,your cannon 80D is E mount camera, so the adapter ring is fit for your camera 
Q
Will this mount to Olympus pen ft cameras?
A
Unfortunately this is for adapting lenses to Olympus' modern digital Micro 4/3 cameras. It won't work with the Pen FT or similar half-frame film cameras, and you most likely won't find anyone making adapters for these. 
Q
Will this fit on my canon 60d? Thanks
A
FD-EOS fit for Canon FD mount lens and canon EF mount camera body. canon 60d is EF mount, so the adapter ring can work with your camera, but you need to check your lens mount. could you pls let us know your lens specific model? service(AT)kentfaith(DO NOT)com, Please note: It is not same between Canon FD mount and EF mount, this adapter ring is only for Canon FD mount lens, please contact us if you want to purchase for Canon EF mount lens. 
Q
Why could not adjust the aperture when use EOS-M4/3 adapter ring
A
  1. As Canon’s EOS lenses are electronically controlled,most Canon EF mount lenses do not feature a manual aperture ring,so when used on our EOS-M4/3, which is a full manual operation adapter ring, the aperture could not be transferred to the camera, it will stop down to its smallest f/stop by default.
  2. Some buyer mentioned could not adjust the aperture, actually this is because your lens does not have the aperture control function, If your lens does not have a manual aperture control ring, it will stop down to its smallest f/stop by default
  3. You could set your aperture via this way, but we do not suggest to use this way: You can control the f-stop by putting the lens on an EOS body, stop it down using the DOF preview button, and while holding the button down taking the lens off the camera. You can then transfer the lens to the M4/3 camera, and it will retain the f-stop.
 
Related Video
K&F Concept Canon EF Lenses to Sony E Mount Camera Adapter
K&F M13101 Canon FD Lenses to Sony E Lens Mount Adapter
K&F M13111 Canon FD Lenses to Fuji X Lens Mount Adapter
Related Blog

Can You Use A Canon Lens On A Sony Camera ?

Using lenses across brands is a common problem among photography enthusiasts and professional photographers. Many people own different brands of cameras and lenses and want to be able to use them across brands to take full advantage of the equipment they already have. Today, we will explore the poss...

Best Canon Ef Mount Lenses Best Canon Fd Mount Lenses Best Canon M Mount Lenses Best Sony Adapter For Canon Lenses Best Canon Mount Lenses Best Canon Fd Mount Camera Best Canon Mount Telephoto Lenses Best Canon Lenses To Adapt To Mirrorless Canon Camera T-adapters Best Price Canon Fd Adapter Problems

M42 To Leica M Adapter Canon Ack-e6 Adapter Kit Sony A6500 Canon Mount Holga Adapter For Canon Eos Rebel Contax Lens Adapter Sony Instax 210 Lens Adapter Techart Pro Adapter Nikon Best Legacy Pentax K Mount Primes Sony Action Cam Handycam Adapter Sony Radio Steering Wheel Adapter