I plan to use the lens for bird photography, but it has a great range 150-500 mm. It is a bit heavy but doable hand held. Looking forward to the possible shots in the future.

I bought this for my Canon EFS 17-55 mm f/2.8 IS USM. I am still using it on the same lens and is doing a very good job without distorting or altering the images. Great stuff

Canon G7X MkII will NOT fit in this case ...I bought this case intending it to fit my Canon G7X Mk II. Although the internal dimensions on the Amazon page suggested it would fit (camera 105 x 61 x 42 mm, case internals 112 x 75 x 45 mm), in fact it doesn't. It's just about possible to force-fit it into the case, but zipping it up is impossible - and attempting to do so results in the camera powering up and attempting to push the lens out into the unyielding case - not good for the lens mechanism, and of course it will quickly flatten the battery.Other than that, it's a good little case, well-made, reasonably padded - just NOT quite suitable for the Canon G7X II. I bought a Case Logic QPB202 Hard Shell Case instead, which is a perfect fit.

I decided to spring for a little more to get the Canon OEM lens hood for my 50 mm lens. Although there are cheaper options, many of the review were less that glowing regarding fit and finish. I am happy with this purchase, but it is not the cheapest option.Pros:Fit is perfect and build seems to be good.Cons: it is a ring of plastic that costs $23

Professional reviewers of the Canon M6 Mark II bemoan the lack of quality native lens. Get over it. Circular file those kit zoom lens like the ones handed out in Canon’s press preview events. (I have given away one M50 camera body and kit zoom lens with another giveaway to come.)Sigma has released three quality EF-M fast prime lens. I have been using both the 16 mm f/1.4 (24 mm equivalent focal length for full sensor) and 56 mm f/1.4 (84 mm). Along with Canon’s 32 mm f/1.4 (51 mm), these are excellent lenses. The advantage of the Mark II higher resolution sensor (compared to the M50) and good prime glass can be seen in 11x17 and 13x19 prints. Hopefully, Canon will release a quality EF-M zoom lens in the near future.Why spend thousands on a prosumer crop sensor camera? Two reasons. First, you avoid the greater bulk and weight of full sensor camera body and glass. Second, the Canon M6 Mark II is an excellent camera for concert photography without a photo pass. It passes for an inexpensive compact camera. Buy a good seat within reach of the 32 mm or 56 mm lens. No EVF or zoom lens to call attention. Elevate the camera slightly to clear the heads of those in front of you. Limit shooting time and dim the LCD display to be courteous to those behind you. The wide shots and medium crops will be excellent to print and share with family and friends. Leave the commercial stuff to the pros.2/4/2020 - just returned from a 10 day vacation in US Virgin Islands and British Virgin Islands. The camera and lens got a workout in all conditions, including pouring rain. The Canon 32 mm f/1.4 was the sharpest lens and produced the best photos. After many hours of Lightroom processing and review, I believe the Canon lens outperformed the Sigma 16 mm f/1.4 which excelled in indoor photos, such as the one of the St. Thomas synagogue. The Sigma 56 mm f/1.4 did a nice job as well.I chose to shoot most outdoor shots with an aperture of + or - f/5.0 and a shutter speed of 1/2000th - 1/3200th of a second. Setting my focus point a third or so into the frame, I was able to obtain pretty sharp focus foreground and background. (I am just an amateur. Please forgive my lack of mastery of technical terms.) For what is it worth, I felt the camera struggled a bit with dynamic range, especially shooting the Baths in Virgin Gorda where giant boulders blocked the sunlight and created deep shadows. I was only partially able to bring up the shadows in Lightroom. This was one of those times in the trip (there were others) that I wished I had brought along a full-frame camera, like the impressive Nikon kits lugged by 2 German visitors wadding through the Baths (don't slip).Now a downside or two to this camera. The touch shutter constantly defaults to ENABLE mode, despite constant disabling in the menu. This produces a lot of wasted shots and a focus point on the display that moves around all over the place. And, the EVF stayed in my bag nearly the entire trip. (I used flash on several occasions and had to remove the EVF each time to mount a flash or remote trigger.) It is just easier to compose the shots using the display. I turned the display brightness to maximum, and could make out the display even in the intense sun of the Baths. Seriously consider buying this camera as a body only without the EVF and mediocre kit zoom lens. I doubled down and ordered a second body.

I'd originally planned to get the RF 100-500 mm L lens, but it costs nearly $3,000. At well under 20 percent of that price, this is a great value. Sure, it's a little slower and only 400 mm at most, but it's a lot lighter and takes very good pictures. I haven't compared it directly against that L lens, but pictures are comparable to or slightly better than the (e.g.) Tamron 150-600 mm G2 EF, although with less reach (but a delight to carry around). I'm very glad that I bought this (100-400 mm) lens.

After purchasing the Canon R6 with the 24-105 kit lens, which I also enjoy, the 85 mm RF lens is an absolute joy to use. I like the feel and results of the 85 mm lens. I am not a professional photographer but I like the professional results of the 85 mm lens. I am glad the lens is on my camera and in the camera bag.

Fit well on both canon 18-55 mm and 55-250 mm lens, however I am not able to used the lens cap properly, lens cap is not getting fit nicely on it, so you have to take it out for carrying the lens inside the bag, about the picture quality, shall update soon after using for sometime.