What can I say! It's a Canon body cap that will fit any canon camera with EF anf EF-S mount, doesn't matter if it's a full frame, APS-C, or film. In other words, if your camera was made in the last 30 years, this cap will fit!

Not much to say here, this device allows you to mount an EF lens onto your EOS-M camera, and appears to be well built. Done.

I have a Canon EOS 60D with a stock EF-S 18-135 IS zoom lens and had yet to purchase any additional lenses before buying this one. I am a hobbyist and and amateur where photography is concerned, so I can't speak to all of the details of why this is a great lens, but I can attest to the beauty of the images that this lens captures. Beautiful detail, gorgeous depth of field and really pleasing "bokeh" that really does seem to elevate my photos. I am so glad I added this lens to my kit!

So you finally decided on getting the EOS M (it's flaws considered). I assume you are a canon user, have a couple of good (canon EF/EF-S mount) lens lying around and would like to be able to use those on you EOS M. Just like me, you love your canon dslr but sometimes wish you can travel light but still be able to enjoy the canon ecosystem that you have grown to love. If you are what I assume you are, get this lens adapter.I took a gamble and bought a "like-new" used from a seller at Amazon and was very happy with a purchase. For anything more than $150 I probably would think twice. But I am not taking a start out because of the price. This adapter handles every canon mount lens I threw at it. The build quality is nice. The design (the way it attaches to the eos m; the included, detachable tripod mount) is well thought of... just perfect.

Exactly what I needed to use the Canon EF 50mm lens with my Canon EOS M50!

About a year ago I bought the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM lens. At the time, it appealed much more to me than its (more than three times the price) "big brother" - the lens did well for me but left me wanting MORE! I just got this lens, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM. It is worth every penny - those of you who have used an IS lens before will know what to expect in that regard, however if you have never owned a lens with canon's "L" glass, you are in for a treat! The color and image quality are far above the cheaper canon line. And the fixed f/2.8 is a fantastic advantage to have. I do mostly indoor concert photography and this lens has been a dream come true. (i know that sounds lame... check one out and you will see what I mean.!) If the fixed f stop isn't that big of a deal to you, im sure the f/4 is probably a good lens as well....however I can definitely say that this was a smart buy!

It is pretty helpful to mount any EF lens with my Canon M50 and there is no change in Auto focus and image stabilization which is too good...

Along with the 70-200 f/4 IS L, this lens is always in my backpack when I'm doing travel photography, here is why:- Lightweight, you basically don't feel it in your backpack.- Weather sealed when used with a filter.- Very fast autofocus.- No purple fringing like I used to have with my Canon EF-S 10-22mm.- Distortion is moderate.- Has 77mm filter diameter, with is the case for a lot of Canon lenses.Its biggest competitor is the Canon EF 16-35 f/2.8 II (or I) but I personally don't need f/2.8 with this kind of travel around lens. If I want a nice bokeh at a short focal, I will use my 35mm f/1.4.If you want to see real situation samples, just check my blog and website:[...][...]Emmanuel.