I recently decided to make the switch from a Canon DSLR to a Canon R mirrorless. It was easy to learn since I'm already used to Canons. I bought the EF to RF adapter (with the adjustable ring) so I could use my DSLR lenses with it. My only complaint is that Canon should give you the adapter free (they used to!) when you buy the camera. So far, it's taking good photos, and I decided to buy the kit lens that goes with the camera, so I can use it for all-around use when I'm out and about. I have a very nice Sigma macro lens that I bought at the same time, which needs the EF to RF adapter, but it takes very nice macros on this camera. I'm glad I bought it.

I read this comprehensive review before purchase and you should too:http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/canon-eos-m/canon-eos-mA.HTMI'm an amatuer photog for more than 40 years. Until recently, my only concession to digital photography was the purchase of inexpensive Canon point-n-shoots. As film photography has become a greater burden and digital has caught up in terms of quality while surpassing in convenience and affordability, my discovery of this little gem at a bargain price was perfect timing. Adding a $15 adapter, I can use may ancient but excellent FD mount Canon lenses - think F1 and AE-1 cameras. Auto-focus speed doesn't matter to me because I still prefer to manually set almost everything. That said, the AF performance of the EOS M seems equivalent to that of my son's Nikon 1.My purchases for my entry into serious digital photography to date include: the EOS M with Speedlite 90EX and EOS M 18-55mm IS lense: an SD card (PNY 64 GB High Speed SDXC Class 10): a spare battery (Opteka LP-E12 LPE12 2000mAh Battery Pack): a lense adapter (Fotasy Canon FD Lens to EOS M Lens); and a neck strap (OP/TECH USA System Connector Super Pro A).

If you want to use your old FD lenses, this is one of the best choices. All you need is an adapter ring "Fotasy Canon FD FL Lens to Canon EOS M". The pictures turn out great, you just have to get used to the manual adjustment but there is an automatic ISO adjustment to help, if you want.

The adapter is good, delivery was also very fast, i got it just in 1 day.. But if you really wanna use EF or EF-S lens in mirrorless cameras, you have to keep in mind that the sharpness will decrease by a little amount and you you have to focus the subject very correctly, otherwise the picture will become blurry(specially for the prime lens)..

So you finally decided on getting the EOS M (it's flaws considered). I assume you are a canon user, have a couple of good (canon EF/EF-S mount) lens lying around and would like to be able to use those on you EOS M. Just like me, you love your canon dslr but sometimes wish you can travel light but still be able to enjoy the canon ecosystem that you have grown to love. If you are what I assume you are, get this lens adapter.I took a gamble and bought a "like-new" used from a seller at Amazon and was very happy with a purchase. For anything more than $150 I probably would think twice. But I am not taking a start out because of the price. This adapter handles every canon mount lens I threw at it. The build quality is nice. The design (the way it attaches to the eos m; the included, detachable tripod mount) is well thought of... just perfect.

About a year ago I bought the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM lens. At the time, it appealed much more to me than its (more than three times the price) "big brother" - the lens did well for me but left me wanting MORE! I just got this lens, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM. It is worth every penny - those of you who have used an IS lens before will know what to expect in that regard, however if you have never owned a lens with canon's "L" glass, you are in for a treat! The color and image quality are far above the cheaper canon line. And the fixed f/2.8 is a fantastic advantage to have. I do mostly indoor concert photography and this lens has been a dream come true. (i know that sounds lame... check one out and you will see what I mean.!) If the fixed f stop isn't that big of a deal to you, im sure the f/4 is probably a good lens as well....however I can definitely say that this was a smart buy!

My experience with Canon has been with the T3i, T6, 7dmk2 and 6dmk2. Each of these cameras were good in their own ways, but were not perfect. IQ was my biggest complaint, especially in low light.The R6 definitely has better IQ than these previous cameras and performs much better under low light conditions. The eye focus feature is helpful but takes some practice to learn. The images I get with my R6 compared to my 6dmk2 are noticeably sharper and show better tones overall.I am currently using only EF lenses on my R6 thanks to Canon's brilliant adapter! All my EF lenses work flawlessly on my E6 thanks to Canon's adapter. I'm waiting for Canon to release more primes in the near future to keep my R6 kit lightweight.As for the negatives, I'm not a fan of electronic viewfinders. Nothing beats the optical viewfinders of Canon's older dslr's. Also, a top lcd display would have been nice, but it's not a dealbreaker for me.Overall, I highly recommend the R6, especially if you own multiple EF lenses (just remember to purchase the adapter).

I purchased a Canon FD to Leica M adapter in order to get some more use out of my 17mm Canon lens. I’m pretty impressed with it so far. It seems considerably better quality than the cheap imported adapters, and not as expensive as a Novoflex. The lens hooks up solid and it feels solid on the camera body. I will most likely try some of their other adapters as necessary.