Related Blog
Lens Turbo Ii Adapter
Tamron Adaptall ii Lenses to Sony E Lens Mount Adapter K&F Concept M23101 Lens Adapter
$27.99
$39.99
Save $12.00 Instantly
Add to Cart
Pentacon 6 Kiev 60 Lenses to Mamiya 645 Lens Mount Adapter K&F Concept M27261 Lens Adapter
$34.99
Save Instantly
Add to Cart
TAM-L Manual Focus Compatible with Tamron Adaptall (Adaptall-2) Lens to L Mount Camera Body Lens Mount Adapter
$27.99
$39.99
Save $12.00 Instantly
Add to Cart
Tamron Adaptall ii Lenses to Micro Four Thirds (M4/3) Camera Mount Adapter
$24.99
Save Instantly
Add to Cart
Tamron Adaptall II Lenses to M42 Lens Mount Adapter K&F Concept M23241 Lens Adapter
$27.99
$29.99
Save $2.00 Instantly
Add to Cart
Lens Mount Adapter Compatible with Tripod Mount for Hasselblad V Mount Lens to Sony E Mount Camera for Sony A7 A7iii A6000 A6300 A6500 A5000 A5100 NEX 7 NEX 5 NEX 5N 6 3N
$39.99
$59.99
Save $20.00 Instantly
Add to Cart
Tamron Adaptall 2 Lenses to Canon EF Lens Mount Adapter K&F Concept M23131 Lens Adapter
$29.99
$39.99
Save $10.00 Instantly
Add to Cart
Pentax 67 Lenses to Canon EF Lens Mount Adapter with tripod mount K&F Concept M34131 Lens Adapter
$43.99
$46.99
Save $3.00 Instantly
Add to Cart
Related Product
$27.59
Related Reviews
Perfect
With the right eBay silicone turbo adapter it fits great on a hood stacked 1979 Mercedes 300SD
20/10/2022
I can hear my Turbo somewhat and i feel the ...
I can hear my Turbo somewhat and i feel the difference
09/08/2022
Still Canon's Best Versatile Zoom!
Still Canon's best versatile zoom! Despite the less-than-glowing official reviews, this new 24-105 is a worthy purchase. I've owned the Mark I version three times, the 24-70 f/2.8 II, and the 24-70 f/4. My major disappointment with the f/2.8 II was lack of IS. Halloween and Christmas pics were next to impossible to get without toting a tripod around. The f/4 was very nice since it had IS, but I still missed that 105mm!I just recently purchased the Tamron 24-70 G2, which is a fantastic lens (f/2.8 and Vibration Compensation), but guess what...I missed that 105mm! So, decided to buy this lens, and after a little bit of AFMA, the lens is superb! Quick focusing, sharp images (much improved in corners), and lets in more light than the previous version.No, it doesn't have 2.8, but the IS is better than the first version, so that helps tremendously with slow moving subjects. You can shoot everything from wide landscapes to head and should portraits with nice bokeh. Yes, you lose some quality when compared to the 24-70s, but that is pure physics. This is the best compromise between image quality and focal range in my experience.I uploaded some pics I took today. These were not processed in post, just shot in Landscape picture style, and converted to jpeg in Canon's DPP.
03/06/2022
Canon G7X MkII will NOT fit in this case ...
Canon G7X MkII will NOT fit in this case ...I bought this case intending it to fit my Canon G7X Mk II. Although the internal dimensions on the Amazon page suggested it would fit (camera 105 x 61 x 42 mm, case internals 112 x 75 x 45 mm), in fact it doesn't. It's just about possible to force-fit it into the case, but zipping it up is impossible - and attempting to do so results in the camera powering up and attempting to push the lens out into the unyielding case - not good for the lens mechanism, and of course it will quickly flatten the battery.Other than that, it's a good little case, well-made, reasonably padded - just NOT quite suitable for the Canon G7X II. I bought a Case Logic QPB202 Hard Shell Case instead, which is a perfect fit.
24/04/2022
Works perfect with the Mavic II Pro
Received the ND Lens and tested them immediately. They work perfect with the Mavic II Pro and adds that extra element of richness to your photos and video.
10/04/2022
Canon EF 2.0 Mk III Telephoto Extender
To say I was apprehensive of purchasing this tele-converter would be an understatement. After owning the Canon EF 2.0X mk II and being completely disappointed and underwhelmed with it, it took me years to decide to try another 2x extender. After I did purchase it a few weeks back, it even sat in my bag a week or 2 before I decided to pull it out and try using it.With a tool like this, you want to use it for the right reasons and on the right kind of lenses. With that said, I'm using this on the Canon 300mm 2.8mm professional lens. Because the Canon 300mm has a smallish range, I've always shot with the Canon EF 1.4 MkII telephoto extender tacked on the back of it. The 300 is such a sharp lens, I lose very little sharpness using the 1.4 tele. Being a bird/wildlife photographer, I am always looking for more and more MM, so I decided to go ahead and try it.So far it's been everything I was hoping for. Much sharper than the 2.0 Mk II with the addition of new coating on the glass, this rugged and now very sharp tele didn't disappoint. Without doing any scientific study I would say this is at least 50% sharper, and at least that much better with contrast than its older counterpart.As always Canon L pro equipment is built like a tank, with dust proof and water resistant construction, it keeps up with the Pro L lens standard. The Mk III appears a bit smaller than the Mk II and the "white" coating has changed with the Mk III line of lenses, so the color is a bit different on the outside.Though I still have tons of shooting to do with it, so far I love it, and though it is high priced, appears to be well with it.As with any additional glass added to your lens, you really need to learn how to shoot with this tele. Forget hand holding it, use a tripod. Also because this is a 2X extender, you're losing a LOT of light. With my Canon 300mm 2.8, with the 2.0 mk III I'm now shooting at aperture of f/5.6. You're also losing a LOT of autofocus speeds. Canon is saying as much as 75%, but it didn't feel that high. So you need to use this lens in good to great lighting, on a tripod using already good Canon glass.Ricky
30/11/2021
Legendary Canon Glass Gets "Updated" (reposted re
When I read the news of Canon releasing a new Mark II version of this lens the first thought that came to my mind was why? Has Canon lost its mind? Why would you mess around with a lens that has become a staple of nearly every professional Canon user in the world? Since this lens was released in September of 2001 it has earned a reputation as being one of the most rugged and sharpest lenses of its kind. Professional photographer and photo equipment reviewer Ken Rockwell, for example, borrowed this lens from a friend to test who had dropped it off an elephant to the cobblestones nine feet below while shooting in India. Even with that event in its history Ken gave it a stunningly positive review! Many of the most famous photos taken in the last nine years were taken with this lens, including many of the photos that appear in Canon's own sales brochures. In the lens life cycle, if such a thing exists, this lens is hardly an old timer at nine years old. With its proven powerful robust image stabilizer, legendarily sharpness, and tank-like build, one cannot help wonder what the motivation for fixing something that's not broke is. I think the real motivation was keeping "pace" with Nikon and raising prices.Canon is seen more and more as falling behind its nemesis Nikon. With the recent release of Nikon's VR II vibration reduction which supposedly can work up to four stops, Canon had to fire back with a "new" version of the image stabilizer on its own lenses. Thus IS II was born. Needless to say, the new Nikon 70-200 lens retails for over (...) on Amazon as opposed to this "old" Canon lens which sells for about (...). It's expected that new Canon 70-200 2.8L IS II will retail for at least (...) if not more. Is the new lens really worth (...) more than the old lens still being sold? I own this "old" model now for about six months and the only way I can see improvement is if somehow Canon could recreate this same lens, ruggedness and all, at half the weight. Now that would be something worth paying (...) or more for! In reality, the new model will actually weigh 20 grams more than the "old" model. So much for progress!I have shot indoor and outdoor shots both hand held and with my Bogen automatic mono-pod with this lens. In both cases the results have been nothing short of amazing. Clear sharp images almost every time with magnificent color and superb brokeh (blur quality). The image stabilization is first rate and runs hard and strong. Don't be fooled into saving money buying the other versions of this lens. If you ever expect to be free from using a flash and get great results in reasonable natural lighting, this is the lens to buy. If you can't afford to buy this lens then save up for it. If you compromise you may be sorry later.I believe that any changes Canon has made to the new lens will largely be undetectable by professional and amateur photographers alike. The only exception to this is the added weight, increased price, and the very slight ability of the new model to focus closer (about 8"). It's also hard to see how the current powerful image stabilization could be made much better. At some point it all becomes a matter of subject movement and no stabilization system can deal with that other than using higher shutter speeds. That said, the more important question to ask is whether Canon produced a "better" lens at all? Currently we have no test reviews to look at and it is entirely possible that the new lens may actually under perform this "old model". We just don't know at the moment. For my money I would grab this "old" model while you can. Not only is there hardly any risk, but in all likely-hood the after market value of this lens may soon rise.MY UPDATED COMMENTS: Despite some new positive reviews on the new lens, I still doubt that most will notice much of a difference between the new and the old lenses unless they really blow up the image. The old lens produced images that graced some of the top publications worldwide for the last 10 years with nothing but praise. Canon has effectively fooled you all to push though a huge price increase never before seen for an upgrade of the same type lens. It seems the consumer is once again the victim and they don't even realize it!
01/08/2021
Still a GREAT lens despite the Mark II being avail
[For unclear reasons this review and all others for the Mark I lens have disappeared, I'm re-posting mine]I purchased this lens about 8 months ago as my first "L" glass - since then I have added the 24-70 f2.8 Canon (without IS) to complete the range 24-200 mm at f2.8. I really can't say enough good things about this lens, though in retrospect I might have bought the 24-70 first as it is a bit more versatile. The build quality is terrific and the IS is VERY helpful especially at the longer focal lengths. The f2.8 also allows you to get a teleconverter to double it to 400 mm (though I don't have that as of yet). Though I'm sure the f4.0 is a great lens, the extra stops on this lens allows you to take existing light pictures in amazingly dim conditions. One of my primary uses for this lens will be school programs as it will allow pictures without flash in many of those conditions (especially after a body upgrade to push the ISO a bit - but that's another story). This is the type of purchase that changes the level of photography you are capable of. If you can afford it, you will be very pleased with the results and will have a lens that will likely be a mainstay of your equipment likely for decades. Other reviews have noted that this lens turns heads / looks impressive and that is true though I don't think that is a reason to get it - the quality of the pictures is the big payoff.I decided to write this review after hearing that they are coming out with the Mark II version of this lens with "fourth generation" IS and an additional set of lens elements that are supposed to further improve the picture quality. Honestly, I don't see how further improvement in image quality is possible after seeing what this bad boy can do. The modified IS is supposed to allow for an extra stop or two as a hand-held lens which is nice if you are really shaky but I doubt will really improve things much - of course IS is really a "portable tripod" and does not allow additional stops for subjects in motion. IMHO the IS on this lens is more than sufficient for the task and no modification is needed. As I understand it, the Mk II may be priced around $2400. I hope that they keep producing this "Mk I" lens since my advice would be to buy this one and use the money saved perhaps for a prime lens or the aforementioned teleconverter.ADDENDUM: Indeed, the Mark II came out at a pricey $2500. The first 2 reviews for that glass are reportedly people who compare the lenses directly which I cannot do, of course. If I had it to do over again I would still buy this one and perhaps use the leftover funds to upgrade to a T2i body.
30/07/2021
Related Faq
Q
Will this be compatible with a cannon eos 7 mark ii
A
Yes this tripod is compatible been using my eos 7 mark ii for months now and is great hope this helps
Q
Does the autofocus work with the Nikon lens on the Canon camera?
A
This adapter is non-electronic and so will not enable electronic communication between lens and camera, so no autofocus.
Q
I have a nikon d3100 camera and need an adapter to fit a minolta 75-300 lens. does this adapter do that are can you direct me to one that would?
A
K&F have a list of which adapter will work for each lens to camera combination they support
Q
Why camera indicated “lens is not properly installed”?
A
If your camera indicated "lens is not properly installed", please modify the camera menu settings. Usually called the "release the shutter the lens is not installed", you can modify the settings to allow. Specifically refer to the camera manual.Following are some examples:
-
MFT（M4/3 mount camera）'Lens Not Found' - Warning Message Appears
For Panasonic Lumix:
The camera needs to be set to function without a MFT-Mount lens attached. You can do this by changing the following camera setting:
'Menu' -> 'Custom Menu 5' -> 'Shoot W/O Lens' -> 'On'
(Exact naming and location of this option may change depending on camera model)
-
Fujifilm X mount camera, The camera needs to be set to function without a GFX-Mount lens attached. You can do this by changing the following camera setting:
'MENU' -> 'SETUP' -> 'BUTTON/DIAL SETTING' -> 'SHOOT WITHOUT LENS' -> 'ON' (Exact naming and location of this option may change depending on camera model) Choose ON to enable the shutter release when no lens is attached.
-
Sony E mount camera, 'No Lens Attached' - Warning Message Appears
The camera needs to be set to function without a E-Mount lens attached. You can do this by changing the following camera setting:'Menu' -> 'Setup' -> 'Release w/o Lens' -> 'Enable'
(Exact naming and location of this option may change depending on camera model)
-
Nikon 1-Series mirrorless camera , 'Check lens. Pictures can only be taken when a lens is attached' - Warning Message Appears
With a Nikon 1-Series camera (such as the J2), you will need to make sure the camera is in 'Manual' exposure or shooting mode and the focus selection is also set to manual. When in any other mode the camera tries to take control of the lens which is not possible as the adapter does not have any contact with the camera circuitry, so you get the lens check warning as the camera does not think there is a lens attached.
-
'EOS M mirrorless camera ,'No Lens Attached' - Warning Message Appears
The camera needs to be set to function without a EF-M Mount lens attached. You can do this by changing the following camera setting:
'Menu' -> 'Custom Menu' -> 'Custom Function 7' -> Select 'Release shutter w/o lens'
(Exact naming and location of this option may change depending on camera model)
-
Konica Minolta:
For Konica Minolta and "No Lens Attached"
Custom Menu 3
First item "Shutter Lock"
Set it to "Off: no lens"
(Depending on camera model "Shutter Lock" May be in different menu location)
-
'Samsung NX 'No lens.' - Warning Message Appears
The adapter is designed to trigger a sensor inside the camera body itself so no setting needs to be changed. If the error message is coming up with one of our adapters attached, then it is possible that the adapter is not hitting that sensor the way that it should. Usually rotating the adapter slightly in the mount, or un-mounting and remounting the adapter clears the problem with no further action needed. If that doesn't solve the problem, then the best course of action would be to swap out the adapter you have with a replacement.
Q
Is it compatible with a7 ii or a7r ii? another brand differentiates the original and second models of a7x cameras?
A
It works well on both.
Related Video
K&F CONCEPT ND FILTER on SONY A7S II | Honest review
UNBOXING k&f concept lens adapter + Minolta X 700!
New design lens adapter series from K&F Concept
Mitakon Lens Turbo Adapter Mark Ii Mitakon Lens Turbo Adapter Zhongyi Turbo Ii Adapter Leica To Nex Lens Turbo Ii Adapter Ef Zhongyi Lens Turbo Adapters Ver Ii Lens Turbo E Mount Lens Turbo Ii E Mount Lens Turbo Ii M42 To E-mount Lns-1125 25mm C-mount Lens Mitakon Lens Turbo Ii Fuji Mount
Uv Filter For Macro Lens 20mm Diameter Lens Filter Neutral Gray Canon To Sony Flash Adapter Ef-s Lens Mount Adapter Nikon Lens To Olympus Om Mount Adapter Lens Mount Index Function Camera Lens Hip Mount Holster Nikon Mount Adapter Sony C Mount To Nikon Camera Sony A Mount System Cameras