So many people recommended the F2.8 16-35. Gladly I didn't listen and instead bought this lens for the value. Satisfies my needs for UWA, which I use for car shooting, landscaping,architecture. Excellent built quality. For the price, it is a keeper.

Highly recommend. Purchased it to use with my new Sony 4k 55" TV.

Mount seems a little tight. The 18-55 fits much better. Not sure if the lens is re-furb, used, or new. Unsure what "white box" means. Came with no Canon literature or packaging. Lens works well and takes a clear bright pic.I guess the low price is why it came the way it did. All that's left is to go on a picture taking trip and test it against my Olympus E-PL1.

This lens is really sharp and feels really solid. Weather sealing is a nice touch too. I would have gotten the 16-35 f2.8 if i could afford it, but i don't regret getting this one a bit. Besides, if you want a lens for landscapes, you won't need something at f2.8 anyway. Save the money and get a fast prime for low light stuff.

Amazing for the price ! Packaging is decent ! I used this for a Sony 28mm f2.8

I am returning this and instead will buy Weebill 3 from ZhyiunPros of this gimbal:- it looks BEAUTIFUL! The white, the design, specially when it’s on because the Crane M3 logo has a light that turns on- motors are really good.CON:- it is able to balance a Sony a6600 and Sony 10-18mm lens plus a rode microphone on top of the camera.DOES NOT balance a Sony a6600 camera and Sony E 16-55 f 2.8 G (even though the compatibility list from Zhyiun says it does). The issue is:The back arm (where the crane m3 logo is) hits the back of the a6600, and the plate for the balance doesn’t go further back enough that I could balance the a6600 with the 16-55 since there is a lot of weight in the front, making the camera tilt forward. The weebill 3 has a larger space between the back arm and the plate where the camera goes, plus it gives flexibility for larger set ups in case I upgrade my a6600 in the future.

I used my friends Sony headphones and the sound was lame. Didnt expect much being $55, but the noise cancelling works better and the sound is crisp and clean unlike my buddie's $300 Sony headphones. Well worth it.I had a slight issue with the first pair I got, one of the buttons didnt work, exchanged and the next pair was 100% working.

It tried this lens after my 16-35/f2.8 was stolen. It's a great value compared to Canon's other L series lenses. If you don't need the extra speed of the 2.8 lens, I highly recommend it. The only possible con I could come up with is that it is very light compared to the 16-35, which could imply something about its durability, but that's pure conjecture, and I can't subtract a star for that. It could simply be that the 16-35 contains more glass to accomplish the 2.8 aperture.