£58 at time of reviewDJI are so frustrating, every time they bring out a new drone or OSMO, any filters you already own are of no use as DJI have yet again updated the lens and gimbal shape! Also DJI’s filters have been out of stock or coming soon from the moment I bought my Mini 3 Pro! Received my drone 3 weeks ago, got to test these filters over the weekendThese filters are good, add a minimal colour cast, but as I shoot as flat as possible and always correct in FCP-X that’s easy to sort and match between shots, although I wish the ND’s were polarising too (although it can be a faff setting polarising filters correctly too, so most people won’t miss that). The range on these is broad too, 3 - 7 F Stops is essential on really sunny days when you want to keep the shutter down to 50-100 per sec.You can pay a fortune for filters, and I have in the past, so I was keen to try out these Neewer ND filters, as they're essential to keep your frame rate down / consistent, and they're reasonably priced compared to some other brands, including DJI themselves.DJI don't do themselves any favours in the design of their gimbals, getting the filters on and off is a little fiddly so be careful, the gimbal is a sensitive little beast and gets upset very easily! and whatever you do, don't try this with the drone switched on, during the installation the drone needs to be off. This makes this drone a bit of a faff in that respect when changing filters, other models I’ve been able to use magnetic filters, but that's DJI through and through.Hope my review was helpful

I can't believe the difference these ND filters make on my videos and photos from my Osmo Pocket. Very well made and a cinch to put on the lens with a magnetic backing that attaches quickly. my only suggestion would be for Freewell to somehow label each filter in a way that is easier to read.

My old Keurig finally gave up the ghost. Spent HOURS reading about the various new options and decided a wifi-enabled coffee maker was just too much, so opted for this model. Very happy -- the water reservoir is much easier to manage than my older model; the reservoir is set up for a small water filter that (if you opt to use it) has to be replaced every 2 months (a year's supply of filters is less than $10, I think.) Coffee brewing is easy (and I like that this has a 4-oz option, although I usually use 6- or 8-oz cups). This model came with a refillable cup included -- and to my surprise, it makes excellent coffee, is easy to clean and fill. As far as the quality of the coffee --- well, a Keurig maker will never give you 5-star flavor, but it is OK for my needs.

With K&N I don't mind paying the premium price for superb quality. I have yet to be let down by any of their products. I really love their Air Filters and this model K&N 33-2286 High Performance Replacement Air Filter fits my 2008 Armada flawlessly.I have already bought the recharge and cleaning kit previously.Invest money now, be at peace for ever.

Based on packaging and fit (haven't yet had chance to take photos since purchased) these filters look the part. Far better packaged (steel threaded tins with flush foam inlays) than my usual Hoya choice, perfectly screwing onto lens thread and cheaper by about a 3rd. Also come with their own lens cleaning cloth. So far very impressed, so much so that I've bothered to write a review when I rarely do!

The pictures and video you can get out of the drone with the anamorphic are pretty incredible. The other thing that’s nice is that the lens flares aren’t so intense as to be distracting. Everything looks quite professional.With the ND filters, you can also get very long exposure shots, even in a fairly bright environment.

When I read the news of Canon releasing a new Mark II version of this lens the first thought that came to my mind was why? Has Canon lost its mind? Why would you mess around with a lens that has become a staple of nearly every professional Canon user in the world? Since this lens was released in September of 2001 it has earned a reputation as being one of the most rugged and sharpest lenses of its kind. Professional photographer and photo equipment reviewer Ken Rockwell, for example, borrowed this lens from a friend to test who had dropped it off an elephant to the cobblestones nine feet below while shooting in India. Even with that event in its history Ken gave it a stunningly positive review! Many of the most famous photos taken in the last nine years were taken with this lens, including many of the photos that appear in Canon's own sales brochures. In the lens life cycle, if such a thing exists, this lens is hardly an old timer at nine years old. With its proven powerful robust image stabilizer, legendarily sharpness, and tank-like build, one cannot help wonder what the motivation for fixing something that's not broke is. I think the real motivation was keeping "pace" with Nikon and raising prices.Canon is seen more and more as falling behind its nemesis Nikon. With the recent release of Nikon's VR II vibration reduction which supposedly can work up to four stops, Canon had to fire back with a "new" version of the image stabilizer on its own lenses. Thus IS II was born. Needless to say, the new Nikon 70-200 lens retails for over (...) on Amazon as opposed to this "old" Canon lens which sells for about (...). It's expected that new Canon 70-200 2.8L IS II will retail for at least (...) if not more. Is the new lens really worth (...) more than the old lens still being sold? I own this "old" model now for about six months and the only way I can see improvement is if somehow Canon could recreate this same lens, ruggedness and all, at half the weight. Now that would be something worth paying (...) or more for! In reality, the new model will actually weigh 20 grams more than the "old" model. So much for progress!I have shot indoor and outdoor shots both hand held and with my Bogen automatic mono-pod with this lens. In both cases the results have been nothing short of amazing. Clear sharp images almost every time with magnificent color and superb brokeh (blur quality). The image stabilization is first rate and runs hard and strong. Don't be fooled into saving money buying the other versions of this lens. If you ever expect to be free from using a flash and get great results in reasonable natural lighting, this is the lens to buy. If you can't afford to buy this lens then save up for it. If you compromise you may be sorry later.I believe that any changes Canon has made to the new lens will largely be undetectable by professional and amateur photographers alike. The only exception to this is the added weight, increased price, and the very slight ability of the new model to focus closer (about 8"). It's also hard to see how the current powerful image stabilization could be made much better. At some point it all becomes a matter of subject movement and no stabilization system can deal with that other than using higher shutter speeds. That said, the more important question to ask is whether Canon produced a "better" lens at all? Currently we have no test reviews to look at and it is entirely possible that the new lens may actually under perform this "old model". We just don't know at the moment. For my money I would grab this "old" model while you can. Not only is there hardly any risk, but in all likely-hood the after market value of this lens may soon rise.MY UPDATED COMMENTS: Despite some new positive reviews on the new lens, I still doubt that most will notice much of a difference between the new and the old lenses unless they really blow up the image. The old lens produced images that graced some of the top publications worldwide for the last 10 years with nothing but praise. Canon has effectively fooled you all to push though a huge price increase never before seen for an upgrade of the same type lens. It seems the consumer is once again the victim and they don't even realize it!

These filters were just as described and very useful not only as filters but as protection for the lenses from scratches etc